The internet is abuzz with more news and speculation related to the stunning arrest of Huawei CFO Wanzhou Meng:
• I previously noted that “This is about as dumb as the US trying to arrest Julian Assange, but with far nastier geopolitical implications.” For what it’s worth, here’s Wikileaks weighing in:
Editorial comment: The U.S. extradition of Huawei CFO Meng Wanzhou from Canada, for actions performed in China, is the same extra-territorial invasion through lawfare, that the U.S. government is applying to the UK, by extraditing Assange from the UK, for publishing in the UK.
4:26 PM – 6 Dec 2018
• Comrade Balding, an academic formerly based in Shenzhen, has some very interesting thoughts, among them:
There’s more coming on Huawei. I just don’t know when it’s going public
8:58 AM – 6 Dec 2018
Fact: timing of Huawei arrest is a great big political F+*#?!U
Fact: everyone in China knew she broke the US laws. Obama admin knew Huawei broke the law. Trump admin knew Huawei broke the law.
It’s only political if you think she should get away with it
8:48 AM – 6 Dec 2018
FWIW, I’ve know for a few months that there is more coming down the road with Huawei. Have confirmation from multiple unrelated people
2:08 AM – 6 Dec 2018
• The Alibaba-owned South China Morning Post ran this piece Thursday on how Meng told Huawei employees “in an internal talk on compliance that there are scenarios where the company can weigh the costs and accept the risks of not adhering to the rules.” Is China planning to throw Meng under the bus?
• Reuters correspondent “SJ” writes:
What happened on December 1? Xi & Trump met, Huawei founders’ daughter got arrested, Danhua Capital founder committed suicide
10:11 PM – 5 Dec 2018
• Wait, who committed suicide? From SCMP reporter Zheping Huang:
Prominent Stanford physics professor and blockchain venture capitalist Zhang Shoucheng died at age 55 on Dec 1 in the US after fighting depression, according to a family statement. Story TK
“Danhua lists 113 U.S. companies in its portfolio, and most of those companies fall within emerging sectors and technologies (such as biotechnology and AI) that the Chinese government has identified as strategic priorities,” the USTR name-checked Zhang’s VC in its Nov. 20 report
10:48 PM – 5 Dec 2018
Odd timing on that. “The family of Stanford professor Zhang Shoucheng, a world-renowned physicist and venture capitalist, denied speculation on Chinese social media that his death was connected to tensions in US-China relations or the arrest of Huawei’s CFO in Canada on Saturday.” (SCMP)
• An intriguing piece of gossip:
Replying to @BaldingsWorld
Rumor says Meng entered Canada with a Canadian passport. China recently strengthened its no-dual citizenships policy . So that means she voluntarily gave up her Chinese citizenship. If true, does China still have the rights to claim her back?
6:24 PM – 5 Dec 2018
• David Goldman comments:
First, never before has the United States attempted the extraterritorial rendition of a foreign citizen – Meng is a Chinese national – in connection with sanctions violations. It has imposed travel and banking restrictions, but seeking an arrest warrant for this is entirely without precedent. […]
The question is: Who ordered the arrest, and why?
It is possible that President Trump knew about it and sanctioned the arrest, to be sure. But it is unlikely that the president would escalate the conflict with China with the arrest of a senior executive of China’s flagship high-tech manufacturer on the same day that he sought to de-escalate the trade war.
If Trump did not initiate the arrest, who did? There are two alternative possibilities.
The first is that the order came from administration officials who believe that the United States must provoke a confrontation with Beijing now, before China becomes too powerful to intimidate. Some parts of the permanent bureaucracy and the intelligence community believe that China’s economy is fragile and that an economic war would produce an economic crisis and political instability, perhaps even toppling Xi Jinping.
That view may seem fanciful, but it is argued seriously, for example by some former senior officials of the Trump administration.
The second possibility is that Trump’s enemies in the permanent bureaucracy simply want to prevent the president from negotiating a deal with China that would enhance his image and remove risks to economic growth.
Goldman notes that the only American politician to comment publicly on the matter has been Senator Marco Rubio, who earlier this year tried to torpedo Trump’s agreement with Xi regarding ZTE. He “celebrated the arrest” in an email to Axios. Hmm.
• Huawei is in deep trouble and not only in the US. From Reuters: “Japan plans to ban government purchases of equipment from China’s Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and ZTE Corp to beef up its defenses against intelligence leaks and cyber attacks, sources told Reuters.”
• …And: “Australia and New Zealand have already blocked Huawei from building 5G networks.”
• …And: “Britain’s BT Group said on Wednesday it was removing Huawei’s equipment from the core of its existing 3G and 4G mobile operations and would not use the company in central parts of the next network.”
• I’ll close with Professor Balding again – somewhat off-topic, but it caught my eye:
I think what most people who haven’t spent a lot of time in China don’t get is how abnormal the business, economic, financial, and negotiation climate is. People see the shiny tall glass office buildings and the Ritz and they make the assumption they get it. That’s wrong 1/n
The stories that get out in public are wild. The stories that never make it into the public are at least 10x crazier. The IP theft and theft stories you hear about in public are low hanging fruit where someone falls out of favor in Beijing. I know first hand accounts of 2/n
Flat out 10 ten digit USD thefts. Companies who have valid contracts telling a foreign partner they’re ignoring a contract and they will have them abducted or jailed if they even think about trying to enforce a contract with again 10 digit USD values. You DC/NYC debutantes 3/n
simply do not understand what you are dealing with.The rules are different. You think fentanyl doesn’t get various levels of state protection? Get real. You think this IP theft and gangsterism isn’t quasi official policy? Get real. You need to be realistic about your counterparty
6:14 AM – 6 Dec 2018